MILNER CREEK TOWER
While we are still in
Scarborough there is one other river that should not slip our
attention, especially considering all the prior references we have
seen to the colour red. That river is, of course, the Rouge — a
waterway rich in historic relics, having indulged human settlement
since palaeolithic times. Here, just within our municipal
boundaries, we find everything from the Bead Hill archaeological
site, home of a former Seneca village, to the numerous remains of
more recent occupation with abandoned barns, crumbled walls, and
toppled silos dotting this still mostly rural landscape. One also
finds, if one dares to look along the river's more secluded reaches,
not only the modest remnants of the Toronto Zoo's long decommissioned
monorail line, but also the cyclopean ruins of a Canadian Northern
rail bridge which once spanned the Rouge just beyond the foot of
Littles Road.
The object of our
immediate attention, however, is not (as we should by now expect) a
ruin of such conventional pedigree. Indeed, in its current state it
is likely not a "ruin," in the strictest sense, at all. Nor
is it, for that matter, directly connected to the Rouge itself, but
rather to a small sub-branch known as the Milner Creek (technically a
branch of the Morningside Creek, which then shortly connects with the
Rouge to the north). The very remoteness of this particular structure
lends all the more mystery to its construction: a looming concrete
monolith, standing some 20 feet tall over the terminus of a shrouded
gully, into which the Milner Creek flows underground before emptying
into the rest of the Rouge system on the other side of a steep ridge.
Rectangular in shape, with an opening like a grated battlement
starting halfway up the creek-facing side, this bizarre tower appears
grossly out of proportion for any simple manhole or outfall (if
indeed that's all that it is). Even more peculiar, the creek-bed
itself leading up to the structure has been ornately tiled with
bricks, looking almost like a decorative walkway — but for who's
benefit, one must ask, in this quite inaccessible location?
Paved watercourses and
elaborate water management structures are not, of course, unheard of
in urban areas. One need only look further downstream, to the massive
set of baffles and churn-blocks used in mitigating the flow of the
Morningside Creek, to see such works in action. Whether there to
control flooding, drainage, sanitation, or simply to enhance the
otherwise utilitarian aesthetics of said apparatus for a public
space, intriguing architectural features will often accompany a
city's system of waterways. In certain cases, however, these features
seem to exceed any purely functional or ornamental purpose (an
overly-involved double outfall structure found along the Anewen
Greenbelt in the East Don valley comes to mind, as do the
sophisticated series of channels and culverts comprising the Burke
Brook on its way from Sunnybrook to Lawrence Park). In other cases
their very location or surroundings, recondite as they often are, can
lend an air of awed solemnity to these strangely evocative
constructions (one particular outfall, isolated in a clandestine
pocket of Warden Woods, at once feeds a tiny spur of the Taylor Creek
while, in certain transient moments, giving all the vague impressions
of some ancient, arcane shrine — if not the dreadful portal to some
tenebrous otherworld). Such is the essence of water, though, that any
source or conduit thereof will naturally be seen with a certain
primal reverence, and examples like those above are not too uncommon
a sight for anyone with a keen, if somewhat fanciful eye. Yet even
still, this Milner Creek tower quite literally stands above them all.
In both location and construction it is utterly obscure. What
meaning, then, might we attribute to this oddly haunting shaft?
Some toponymical
significance is seemingly bestowed by the nearby occurrence of Water
Tower Gate — although this name would appear more descriptive than
explanatory, and likely refers to the even nearer Rouge Tank
standpipe on Sheppard Avenue. Any combination of water and towers,
though, would (at least at a cursory glance) usually be taken as
symbolic of life, (re)birth, fertility, etc.; the latter with its
obvious phallic connotations, and the former commonly representing
nourishment, baptism, a flow of energy, or the primordial womb of
chaos from which all things emerge. Both water (in the form of a
fountain, or well) and the tower (specifically that proverbial "ivory
tower" of the Song of Solomon) have also, as symbols of
purity, long been associated with the Virgin Mary (and, hence, our
"Madonna of the Don").
Aside from this, we
should immediately recognize "Milner" as a cognate of
"Milne," addressed earlier in relation to the Wilket Creek
artefact. Moreover, we learn from the ONC that this particular
variant of Miller is "commonest in Yorkshire, retaining the
-n- of the Middle and Old English word." Revisiting,
then, the subject of mythical mills — and, more pursuant to the
name at hand, the millers who ran them — certain figures are now
brought accordingly to mind. In Midgley Moor, West Yorkshire,
there is a Chalcolithic cairn mound known as Miller's Grave which,
though of unknown etymology, has earned associations with Much the
Miller's Son, one of Robin Hood's original, if least renowned Merry
Men. Although far from Sherwood Forest, and clearly predating the
time of these famed outlaws, the association is nonetheless bolstered
by this cairn's proximity to another megalith known locally as Robin
Hood's Pennystone. Furthermore, we find the oddly-named Much cited
amongst some of the earliest recorded ballads (Robin Hood and
Queen Catherine, Robin Hood and the Curtal Friar, etc.) as
"Midge," which does come an arrow's-width close to
"Midgley," it must be admitted. We may even find some
unintended linkage through F.A. Leyland who, in editing the second
edition of John Watson's 1775 The History and Antiquities of the
Parish of Halifax, attributed "Miller's Grave" not to
Much, but to "one Lee, a miller," who "committed
suicide in Mayroyd Mill near Hebden Bridge." We now recall
Much's instrumental role in the Gest of Robyn Hode, a ballad
which revolves around the indebted and forlorn knight Sir Richard at
the Lee, with "Lee" generally thought to be a location
somewhere in the nearby Peak District of northern England.
Keeping in mind Robin
Hood's previously theorized linguistic connection to "red king"
(as well as to "maiden-queen," and "the devil"),
if we now turn to the ballad of Robin Hood and Allin a Dale,
we find Much (here referred to as "Nick" the Miller's Son)
is also key in bringing the titular harpist Allin into Robin's fold.
This now evokes a certain ballad-cum-folktale of possible
Northumbrian origin, known by various names, but first recorded in
English as The Miller and the King's Daughter. While each
version of this tale is slightly different, its core theme involves a
fair maiden (often likened to a white swan) being thrown into a river
by a jealous older sister and drowned. When her body eventually comes
upon a mill it is taken up by a miller who then proceeds to fashion
her bones into a harp which, when played, reveals the crime committed
against her. We say this tale is "of possible Northumbrian
origin" because, as the famed 19th century folklorist Francis
James Child pointed out, similar tales appear across Scandinavia as
well — a natural condition as we recall the strong cultural ties
already noted between these two regions by way of the Danelaw.
From here we might
briefly turn back to the topic of Robin Hood, though if only to
pursue the remarkable fact that the infamous Miller of Geoffrey
Chaucer's Canterbury Tales is not only named Robin, but is
also described as wearing a white cloak and hood, while having a
beard "as red as a fox or a sow." With our eyes
already cast towards Nordic York, though, let us return to that other
miller so renowned in both English and Scandinavian lore, Hamlet
(anglicized name of the quasi-historical Jutish prince Amlóði,
variously transliterated as Amlodhi, Amblothæ, and Amleth) who,
as we read in the introduction to Hamlet's Mill:
was identified, in the
crude and vivid imagery of the Norse, by the ownership of a fabled
mill which, in his own time, ground out peace and plenty. Later, in
decaying times, it ground out salt, and now finally, having landed at
the bottom of the sea, it is grinding rock and sand, creating a vast
whirlpool, the Maelstrom (i.e., the grinding stream, from the verb
mala, "to grind"), which is supposed to be a
way to the land of the dead.
Aside from noting this
swirling mixture of rock, sand, and water is already three-quarters
of the way towards concrete, we might also note our tower's position
over the Milner Creek's entry beneath the ground, which can't help
but bring to mind those previously mentioned "lower rivers"
of Hades, and all such streams that delve their own "way to
the land of the dead." Indeed, water and the underworld are
so commonly linked as to hardly require expounding. Having already
made mention of the Styx et al., let us briefly note that the
Sumerians had their Hubur, the Finns their Tuoni, and the Mayans
their various rivers of Xibalba to navigate on course to their
respective afterlives. The Romans, rather than some river, saw Lake
Avernus as the gateway to Hades, while the ancient Egyptians sought
eternal rest in the great reed marsh of Aaru, just beyond the mouth
of the Nile. There is the Shinto land of Yomi, or the "Yellow
Springs," the Zoroastrian bottomless well of Duzakh, and the
Hindu realm of damnation, Naraka, which is said to lay beneath a vast
ocean at the bottom of the universe, not unlike the great well, or
Mímisbrunnr, said to lay at the roots of Norse cosmography.
Likewise, souls and spirits of the dead have long been thought to
sail for such phantom isles as Elysium, Avalon, and Annwn (note the
resemblance to "Anewen" above), whereas mariners of today
still hope to avoid any premature voyage to Davy Jones' Locker.
Furthermore, the abode of
the Gaelic death god Donn — Tech Duinn — was commonly said to lay
somewhere under the Atlantic off the west coast of Ireland. We recall
Donn from our discussion of the river Don and in relation to an
episode from The Destruction of Dá Derga's (the Red
God's) Hostel. We bring this legend to mind again in light of
some recent scholarship from the University of Aberdeen (Collinson,
2011) which has proposed an etymological provenance from a minor
character in this tale, Admlithi (one of the king of Erin's three
jesters), to Hamlet (Amlóði) himself. This claim rests on
a shared linguistic reference to "milling" or "grinding,"
supported by the names of the other two jesters (Mael and Mlithe),
and further squared by a previous assumption that the name, in fact,
arrived by the opposite way (from Norse to Irish) as the word for a
trickster or fool (from the Old Norse ama + óðr,
approaching something like "annoying madness"). We must
note, however, that possibly the earliest reference to Hamlet occurs
as an Old Frisian runic inscription, in the form of Amluþ,
on an 8th century object known as the Westeremden Yew-stick,
recalling the significance of yew to the names of both York and
Toronto, as outlined earlier.
Returning to Donn, and
the convoluted otherworld of Celtic mythology, we now observe that,
aside from having some aforementioned relation to both Dá
Derga and the god Dagda, he has also been linked with the underworld
deity Midir; said to be (depending on the source) either the son or
brother of Dagda, and either the father or brother of Donn (if not
all one and the same entity). At first one sees in this name a close
parallel to the aforementioned Mithra (especially considering such
common alternate spellings as Mithr). To then mix Celt and
Norse once more, we may also note the nominal similarity of Midir
and Mímir, keeper of the above-cited Mímisbrunnr.
While these names, perhaps, bear only a superficial affinity,
consider that when Midir famously lost an eye, he had it restored by
the healing god Dian Cecht, himself the keeper of a magical well.
Meanwhile it was to Mímir that Odin sacrificed one of his eyes
for a drink from the sacred Mímisbrunnr. If we now invoke the
one-eyed swineherd Nár, mentioned shortly after Admlithi in
the last room of Dá Derga's Hostel, or the one-eyed
"red king" of diamonds in profile, or, yet even further,
the "blindness" of "Cecil" above, we're left
somewhat grasping at how to account for it all.
Add, then, to this mythic
hodgepodge the Mímisbrunnr's position at the base of
Yggdrasil, the great world-tree of Norse mythology. Conventional
etymology has "Yggdrasil" arriving from yggr +
drasill, meaning "Odin's horse" (with yggr,
"terrible one" being a common pseudonym for the god). We
might now reflect upon all of the previous associations with horses
that we've seen (particularly with Mithra), but we might also
consider that "Odin's horse," in this context, likely
refers to a metaphorical gallows, recalling how Odin hanged himself
from said tree, in yet another act of self-sacrifice, so as to gain
knowledge of the runes. Here we might glance back to Miller's Grave,
or our talk of Gallows Hill in relation to the mysterious waters of
the Avoca pool and Yellow Creek ravine, with its Roxborough —
"rooks fort" — pillars, suggesting the hallowed birds of
both Odin and Mithra.
Such talk of runes and
pillars suggest another etymology for this tree, though. While
commonly assumed to be an ash, the German scholar Franz Rolf Schröder
read "Yggdrasil" as "yew pillar," deriving its
name from the Proto-Germanic *igwja ("yew tree") and
the Indo-European *dher- ("firmness," "support").
This theory has been gaining support since Schröder first
proposed it back in the 1930s, especially considering such facts as
Yggdrasil often being described as an evergreen (which the ash is
not), and an archaic term for the yew being "needle ash."
Talk of rooks and pillars, meanwhile, brings us back to the tower
itself. In the former case, one could conceivable argue that it bears
some passing resemblance to the chess piece of the same name, noting,
too, a few passing references to this game in previous sections (and
perhaps adding that, in one legend, Midir was said to have won his
mistress Etain in a chess match). In the latter case, we observe that
the concept of some central pillar, axle, or tree — upon which
everything is supported, and around which everything rotates — is
key to the imagery of the cosmic mill. Continuing from the last
passage of Hamlet's Mill quoted above, Santillana and von
Dechend go on to say:
This imagery stands, as
the evidence develops, for an astronomical process, the secular
shifting of the sun through the signs of the zodiac which determines
world-ages, each numbering thousands of years. Each age brings a
World Era, a Twilight of the Gods. Great structures collapse; pillars
topple which supported the great fabric; floods and cataclysms herald
the shaping of the new world.
Here they are describing
a phenomenon known to astronomers as the "lunisolar axial
precession," otherwise known as the "precession of the
equinoxes," or "precession of the equator." This
refers to a cyclical change in the celestial orientation of the
earth's poles, caused by a rotational wobble along its axis
(symbolized by the pillar — and, perhaps, our tower?), over the
course of approximately 25,920 years. Dividing this time-span by
twelve, we then see the dawn of a new astrological age roughly every
2,160 years, and, of course, the death of another (symbolized by the
broken, or fallen pillar — and, perhaps, by certain of our previous
ruins?). Along with this polar realignment also comes a change in
what is currently seen as this planet's "pole star" which,
conveniently enough, brings us directly to our next site.